| Author |
|
polac
Date Registered:
01.2004
Location:
Posts: 2
 |
|
| wrapper plans |  |
Hi all,
I'm currently working on a psycle to vst wrapper. I read the infos about licensing, seems to be legal to release such a wrapper as long as its free, or am I wrong? What do the devs scene think about it, ok for you?
|
|
 22.01.2004, 19:46 |
  |
pooplog
Psycle Developer
Date Registered:
02.2002
Location:
canada
Posts: 231
|
|
|
I dunno about the licensing stuff, but if you write a psycle->vst adapter, i will fix some of the "undocumented features" in my plugins. 
__________________
www.negspect.com
|
|
| 22.01.2004, 21:24 |
 |
FingerSoup
Date Registered:
11.2001
Location:
Toronto, Canada
Posts: 355
|
|
|
quote:
Original by polac
Hi all,
I'm currently working on a psycle to vst wrapper. I read the infos about licensing, seems to be legal to release such a wrapper as long as its free, or am I wrong? What do the devs scene think about it, ok for you?
You can do what you will, but if you use the Psycle core, then you should have the wrapper be open-source as well.
By Psycle to VST wrapper, do you mean you are wrapping the Psycle applications to a VST? or are you wrapping Psycle PLUGINS to a VST?
__________________
I thought you beat the inevitability of death to death, just a little bit...
|
|
| 22.01.2004, 21:25 |
|
polac
Date Registered:
01.2004
Location:
Posts: 2
|
|
|
quote:
I dunno about the licensing stuff, but if you write a psycle->vst adapter, i will fix some of the undocumented features in my plugins.
Hmm, what does this actually mean? I will not release the wrapper if one of the devs disagrees.
quote:
You can do what you will, but if you use the Psycle core, then you should have the wrapper be open-source as well.
I'm using only the machineinterface.h from Arguru, so the open source thing isn't necessary i think.
quote:
By Psycle to VST wrapper, do you mean you are wrapping the Psycle applications to a VST? or are you wrapping Psycle PLUGINS to a VST?
This would be a psycle plugin wrapper then
|
|
| 23.01.2004, 21:03 |
|
nolwenn
Date Registered:
05.2003
Location:
France
Posts: 90
|
|
|
hello Polac
You are working on a VST to Native plugins wrapper for psycle ?
For what usage would be this wrapper ?
Psycle already supports VST plugins.
Or it is for a better VST support (support for midi out), in this case you have to "enter" in the psycle sources , no ? not just write a native plugin
A directX wrapper for Psycle would be great , if it's better than the ffx4
Last edited by nolwenn on 27.01.2004, 17:23 o'clock.
|
|
| 27.01.2004, 17:18 |
|
FingerSoup
Date Registered:
11.2001
Location:
Toronto, Canada
Posts: 355
|
|
|
I Think what he wants to build is a VST that will play Psycle plugins in other programs...
__________________
I thought you beat the inevitability of death to death, just a little bit...
|
|
| 27.01.2004, 21:47 |
|
TranceMyriad
Date Registered:
01.2004
Location:
Australia
Posts: 466
|
|
|
nooooo! Traitor!! ....you don't really need to make one......why not just sequence psycle externally....it would achieve the same thing (you would still get the wave output you want).....and Psycle supports VSTs anyway....i'm afraid i just don't see any real advantage to doing it....
__________________
|
|
| 28.01.2004, 07:25 |
|
gnostik
Date Registered:
02.2002
Location:
Australia
Posts: 38
|
|
|
a psycle vst wrapper would be great!
being able to use the awesome psycle synths and effects in an environment which uses visual automation tracks and sequencing would rock
would you still keep the tracker interface at all or have it just using midi commands in the hosts preferred editing interface (like a piano roll editor) ?
please keep posting updates, i am very interested...
good luck
__________________
If you win the rat race, you're still a rat.
bend your thoughts...unveil your soul
|
|
| 29.01.2004, 13:57 |
|
Aggravated_Alien
Date Registered:
06.2003
Location:
Australia
Posts: 4
|
|
|
For those who don't know Polac is reponsible for coding the Vst Adapter for Buzz.
Welcome Aboard
Last edited by Aggravated_Alien on 31.01.2004, 14:20 o'clock.
|
|
| 30.01.2004, 04:49 |
|
|
