|From dynamix on 07.12.2001, 10:08:
the morphing fft-filter machine!!!!
I thought about the idea of morphing filters.. and i had an interesting idea: the problem (as I think) with a morphing filter is that you allways have a limited amount of filters and if its going to be a complex filter there are many parameters and lfos for morphing needed. So I thougth why not make a FFT-morphing-filter with a graphical userinterface (like the interface of the fft-synth in buzz -> don't remember the name yet..). so you have two fft-graphs where you can draw the start and the end of the filter.. just like in samplitude 2496 (the FFT Filter/Analyser)... so you'll have unlimited (of course limited to the resolution of the fft) "filters" and the most flexible and easiest to use interface! That's an effect I wanted to program myself (with some modifications) before, but I never had the time to get into dsp-programming (and probably won't have). But perhaps someone likes the idea?
|From Pikari on 07.12.2001, 13:30:
some kind of filter envelope?
|From ladproject on 09.12.2001, 17:24:
Hey dynamix, I have seen your post on Buzz wishlist (http://www.buzzmachines.com) and I think that for having this effect in Psycle we must wait that any guy develop it for Buzz and decide to port it on Psycle..
|From dynamix on 09.12.2001, 20:49:
why? the idea of rymix with the bandpass-filters is very kewl and will sopport him on realisation (as much as i can), but I still think although there is a latency problem it would be very kewl to have a morphing-fft-filter, because you could use it for example like steinbergs free-filter: without learning, but with morphing.... and i think this would still be ver kewl.. or not? and last but not least i wrote that i postet this idea to the buzz-wishlist, so anyone can look for him self...
|From sampler on 09.12.2001, 23:51:
yeah! i think that's a good idea!
|From dj_d on 22.12.2001, 21:09:
|From Pikari on 22.12.2001, 22:04:
huh, now that was a BAD joke
|From ksn on 22.12.2001, 22:09:
explain CLEARLY what you mean
|From dynamix on 21.01.2002, 19:11:
ok i'll try again:
|From Pikari on 21.01.2002, 22:11:
dynamix: I think that "explain carefully" -thing wasn't meant for you, but anyway this cleared things
|From ksn on 21.01.2002, 22:19:
|From dynamix on 22.01.2002, 16:42:
ups! ok... no problem..
Powered by: Burning Board 1.0 Beta 4.5eEnglish Translation by AnnaFan
Copyright © 2001 by WoltLab