-psycledelics- (http://psycle.pastnotecut.org/index.php)
|- MAIN BOARD (http://psycle.pastnotecut.org/board.php?boardid=1)
|-- wrapper plans (http://psycle.pastnotecut.org/threadid.php?boardid=1&threadid=1280)


From polac on 22.01.2004, 19:46:

  wrapper plans

Hi all,

I'm currently working on a psycle to vst wrapper. I read the infos about licensing, seems to be legal to release such a wrapper as long as its free, or am I wrong? What do the devs scene think about it, ok for you?


From pooplog on 22.01.2004, 21:24:

 

I dunno about the licensing stuff, but if you write a psycle->vst adapter, i will fix some of the "undocumented features" in my plugins.


__________________
www.negspect.com


From FingerSoup on 22.01.2004, 21:25:

 

quote:
Original by polac
Hi all,

I'm currently working on a psycle to vst wrapper. I read the infos about licensing, seems to be legal to release such a wrapper as long as its free, or am I wrong? What do the devs scene think about it, ok for you?



You can do what you will, but if you use the Psycle core, then you should have the wrapper be open-source as well.

By Psycle to VST wrapper, do you mean you are wrapping the Psycle applications to a VST? or are you wrapping Psycle PLUGINS to a VST?


__________________
I thought you beat the inevitability of death to death, just a little bit...


From polac on 23.01.2004, 21:03:

 

quote:
I dunno about the licensing stuff, but if you write a psycle->vst adapter, i will fix some of the undocumented features in my plugins.


Hmm, what does this actually mean? I will not release the wrapper if one of the devs disagrees.


quote:
You can do what you will, but if you use the Psycle core, then you should have the wrapper be open-source as well.


I'm using only the machineinterface.h from Arguru, so the open source thing isn't necessary i think.


quote:
By Psycle to VST wrapper, do you mean you are wrapping the Psycle applications to a VST? or are you wrapping Psycle PLUGINS to a VST?


This would be a psycle plugin wrapper then


From nolwenn on 27.01.2004, 17:18:

 

hello Polac
You are working on a VST to Native plugins wrapper for psycle ?

For what usage would be this wrapper ?
Psycle already supports VST plugins.

Or it is for a better VST support (support for midi out), in this case you have to "enter" in the psycle sources , no ? not just write a native plugin

A directX wrapper for Psycle would be great , if it's better than the ffx4



From FingerSoup on 27.01.2004, 21:47:

 

I Think what he wants to build is a VST that will play Psycle plugins in other programs...


__________________
I thought you beat the inevitability of death to death, just a little bit...


From TranceMyriad on 28.01.2004, 07:25:

 

nooooo! Traitor!! ....you don't really need to make one......why not just sequence psycle externally....it would achieve the same thing (you would still get the wave output you want).....and Psycle supports VSTs anyway....i'm afraid i just don't see any real advantage to doing it....


__________________


www.quantinuitymusic.com


From gnostik on 29.01.2004, 13:57:

 

a psycle vst wrapper would be great!

being able to use the awesome psycle synths and effects in an environment which uses visual automation tracks and sequencing would rock

would you still keep the tracker interface at all or have it just using midi commands in the hosts preferred editing interface (like a piano roll editor) ?

please keep posting updates, i am very interested...

good luck


__________________
If you win the rat race, you're still a rat.

bend your thoughts...unveil your soul


From Aggravated_Alien on 30.01.2004, 04:49:

 

For those who don't know Polac is reponsible for coding the Vst Adapter for Buzz.

Welcome Aboard

Powered by: Burning Board 1.0 Beta 4.5eEnglish Translation by AnnaFan
Copyright 2001 by WoltLab